Upgrade Vyper to 0.3.0 to Fix High-Severity Memory Corruption Vulnerability
A flaw in Vyper versions before 0.3.0 allows memory corruption during internal function calls, risking incorrect smart contract behavior.

Key points
- Vyper versions from 0.1.0b4 up to 0.3.0 contain a memory corruption flaw.
- The issue stems from incorrect stack tip pointers during internal calls within arrays.
- National Vulnerability Database rates the vulnerability as high severity with a score of 8.3.
Developers building smart contracts using the Vyper programming language must upgrade to version 0.3.0 immediately to address a high-severity memory corruption vulnerability. The flaw affects all versions starting from 0.1.0b4 and prior to 0.3.0. This weakness allows attackers to potentially corrupt memory, which can lead to unpredictable and incorrect behavior within deployed blockchain contracts.
The risk
The vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2021-48020, is caused by an incorrect stack tip pointer. This error occurs specifically when internal function calls are performed inside arrays. According to the National Vulnerability Database, the flaw is classified under CWE-787. The memory corruption arises from how the compiler handles these specific internal call structures, leading to data integrity issues at the execution level.
Who is exposed
Any smart contract compiled with Vyper versions before 0.3.0 is exposed to this risk. The vulnerability manifests in contracts that place internal calls in specific complex structures. These include nested array elements, external call arguments, struct literals, or raw log topics. Developers who utilized these coding patterns in earlier versions are directly affected by the potential for memory corruption.
Cost and compliance
The National Vulnerability Database assigns a CVSS score of 8.3 to this vulnerability, categorizing the severity as high. This rating reflects the potential impact on the integrity and availability of smart contracts. No specific financial losses or widespread exploitation incidents are detailed in the advisory, but the high score indicates significant potential for system compromise if the flaw is triggered.
Our take on the response
Teams should prioritize auditing existing contracts for the specific coding patterns mentioned in the advisory. Upgrading the development environment to Vyper 0.3.0 is the only confirmed mitigation. This suggests that a retrospective review of compiled bytecode may be necessary for critical applications that relied on complex internal call structures in previous versions.
What defenders should look for
Security teams should monitor for anomalous behavior in smart contracts that utilize complex internal call structures. Look for unexpected state changes or execution failures that do not match the intended logic. Check transaction logs for deviations in expected outcomes when functions interact with nested arrays or struct literals. If irregularities appear, pause interactions with the affected contracts and isolate them for forensic analysis to prevent further potential corruption.
What to do and how to stay safe: Vyper
- Upgrade your Vyper compiler installation to version 0.3.0 or later to eliminate the memory corruption flaw.
- Audit existing smart contracts for internal function calls placed inside nested arrays, external call arguments, or struct literals.
- Review transaction logs for unexpected behavior or state changes in contracts that used these specific coding patterns.
- Rebuild and redeploy affected contracts using the updated compiler version once you have verified the code logic remains correct.
Step-by-step guide: Unpatched Software Response: Containment, Recovery, and Prevention Steps
General security guidance from the BlueTeam Herald newsroom. It is not confirmed advice from the organisations named in this story.
Frequently asked questions
Which versions of Vyper are affected by this vulnerability?
Vyper versions from 0.1.0b4 before 0.3.0 are affected by the memory corruption vulnerability.
What specific coding patterns trigger this vulnerability?
The vulnerability is triggered by internal function calls performed inside nested array elements, external call arguments, struct literals, or raw_log topics.
What is the severity rating of CVE-2021-48020?
The National Vulnerability Database rates CVE-2021-48020 as high severity with a CVSS score of 8.3.



